BLOCKCHAIN IN EDUCATION: POTENCIALS AND CHALLENGES IN ACADEMIC RECORDS AND CERTIFICATIONS

Authors

  • Erna Widyasari Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Sumardi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Ahmad Muhibbin Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Iyad Abdallah Al- Shreifeen Taibah University, Saudi Arabia

Keywords:

Blockchain, Education, Potential, Challenges, Academic Record, Certification.

Abstract

Blockchain in education in today's digital age has paved the way for innovative technologies that have the potential to revolutionize various aspects of life, including the education sector. Blockchain, as one of the leading technological breakthroughs, offers the possibility to transform the way academic recording and certification are done in the education system. This article aims to identify and analyze potential applications of blockchain in education, in relation to academic recording and certification management, as well as highlighting the key challenges to be addressed for successful implementation. The research method used is literature using the theory in accordance with the context of research. Research findings suggest that the potential for blockchain use in education lies mainly in its capacity to provide a safe, transparent, and irrevocable way to store academic records. Using this technology, educational institutions can guarantee the integrity and authenticity of academic documents, facilitate verification processes by third parties, and improve operational efficiency. Furthermore, the adoption of blockchain can strengthen the recognition of academic credentials globally and support the development of new teaching techniques through the reliability and security it provides. However, the adoption of blockchain in the education sector also poses a series of challenges. These include technical barriers related to the necessary infrastructure development, training needs for human resources, issues of privacy and compliance with existing regulations, as well as significant initial costs for implementation. In addition, acceptance from various stakeholders in the education sector should be considered to ensure smooth adoption of technology. To address these challenges and maximize the potential of blockchain technology in education, the study suggests strategic steps that include developing supportive regulations, investing in training and capacity-building for faculty and students, pilot projects to test the effectiveness of implementation, and adopting adaptive and flexible approaches by educational institutions. Through collaborative efforts between governments, educational institutions, and industry, blockchain has the potential to transform the way the world views academic registration and certification, making the process more efficient, secure, and globally recognized.

References

Anggraeni, R., & Maulani, I. E. (2023). Pengaruh Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Perkembangan Bisnis Modern. Jurnal Sosial Teknologi, 3(2), 94-98.

Bahn, S., & Weatherill, P. (2013). Qualitative social research: A risky business when it comes to collecting ‘sensitive’data. Qualitative Research, 13(1), 19–35.

Bakri, A. A., Sudarmanto, E., Fitriansyah, N. D. P. S., Rukmana, A. Y., & Utami, E. Y. (2023). Blockchain Technology and its Disruptive Potential in the Digital Economy. West Science Journal Economic and Entrepreneurship, 1(08), 338-347.

Bashir, I. (2017). Mastering blockchain. Packt Publishing Ltd.

Belotti, M., Božić, N., Pujolle, G., & Secci, S. (2019). A vademecum on blockchain technologies: When, which, and how. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 21(4), 3796-3838.

Belotti, M., Božić, N., Pujolle, G., & Secci, S. (2019). A vademecum on blockchain technologies: When, which, and how. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 21(4), 3796-3838.

Bjelobaba, G., Paunovic, M., Savic, A., Stefanovic, H., Doganjic, J., & Miladinovic Bogavac, Z. (2022). Blockchain technologies and digitalization in function of student work evaluation. Sustainability, 14(9), 5333.

Boddy, C. R. (2016). Sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal.

Bowling, A. M., & Ball, A. L. (2018). Alternative certification: A solution or an alternative problem?. Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(2), 109-122.

Campbell, S. (2014). What is qualitative research? Clinical Laboratory Science, 27(1), 3.

Capece, G., Levialdi Ghiron, N., & Pasquale, F. (2020). Blockchain technology: Redefining trust for digital certificates. Sustainability, 12(21), 8952.

Chandra, A. (2010). Perancangan data warehouse pada software laboratory center. ComTech: Computer, Mathematics and Engineering Applications, 1(2), 585-597.

Christensen, L. B., Johnson, B., Turner, L. A., & Christensen, L. B. (2011). Research methods, design, and analysis.

Christiani, L. (2020). Preservasi, konservasi dan restorasi dokumen di Rekso Pustaka. Anuva: Jurnal Kajian Budaya, Perpustakaan, Dan Informasi, 4(3), 371-382.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2002). Research and rhetoric on teacher certification. Education policy analysis archives, 10, 36-36.

Delgado-von-Eitzen, C., Anido-Rifón, L., & Fernández-Iglesias, M. J. (2021). Application of blockchain in education: GDPR-compliant and scalable certification and verification of academic information. Applied sciences, 11(10), 4537.

Dinh, T. T. A., Liu, R., Zhang, M., Chen, G., Ooi, B. C., & Wang, J. (2018). Untangling blockchain: A data processing view of blockchain systems. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 30(7), 1366-1385.

Ghazali, O., & Saleh, O. S. (2018). A graduation certificate verification model via utilization of the blockchain technology. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), 10(3-2), 29-34.

Gliner, J. A., Morgan, G. A., & Leech, N. L. (2011). Research methods in applied settings: An integrated approach to design and analysis. Routledge.

Gräther, W., Kolvenbach, S., Ruland, R., Schütte, J., Torres, C., & Wendland, F. (2018). Blockchain for education: lifelong learning passport. In Proceedings of 1st ERCIM Blockchain workshop 2018. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET).

Gräther, W., Kolvenbach, S., Ruland, R., Schütte, J., Torres, C., & Wendland, F. (2018). Blockchain for education: lifelong learning passport. In Proceedings of 1st ERCIM Blockchain workshop 2018. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET).

Gravells, A. (2014). The certificate in education and training.

Guo, H., & Yu, X. (2022). A survey on blockchain technology and its security. Blockchain: research and applications, 3(2), 100067.

Guustaaf, E., Rahardja, U., Aini, Q., Maharani, H. W., & Santoso, N. A. (2021). Blockchain-based education project. Aptisi Transactions on Management, 5(1), 46-61.

Haryani, H., Wahid, S. M., & Fitriani, A. (2023). Analisa Peluang Penerapan Teknologi Blockchain dan Gamifikasi pada Pendidikan. Jurnal MENTARI: Manajemen, Pendidikan dan Teknologi Informasi, 1(2), 163-174.

Holotescu, C. (2018). Understanding blockchain opportunities and challenges. In Conference proceedings of» eLearning and Software for Education «(eLSE) (Vol. 14, No. 04, pp. 275-283). Carol I National Defence University Publishing House.

Holotescu, C. (2018). Understanding blockchain opportunities and challenges. In Conference proceedings of» eLearning and Software for Education «(eLSE) (Vol. 14, No. 04, pp. 275-283). Carol I National Defence University Publishing House.

Indrawati, A., Subagyo, H., Sihombing, A., Wagiyah, S. A., & Afandi, S. (2017). Analyzing the Impact of Resampling Method for Imbalanced Data Text in Indonesian Scientific Articles Categorization. Education, 2019.

Iyer, S., Jain, S. P., Subramanian, S., & Jain, I. S. P. (2022). Adopting a Student Centric Education Blockchain System. International Journal of Information and Communication Sciences, 7(3).

Jacobsen, B. H., Anker, H. T., & Baaner, L. (2017). Implementing the water framework directive in Denmark–lessons on agricultural measures from a legal and regulatory perspective. Land Use Policy, 67, 98-106.

Karamachoski, J., Marina, N., & Taskov, P. (2020). Blockchain-based application for certification management. Tehnički glasnik, 14(4), 488-492.

Kolvenbach, S., Ruland, R., Gräther, W., & Prinz, W. (2018). Blockchain 4 education.

Lancaster, G. (2007). Research methods in management. Routledge.

Liu, L., Han, M., Zhou, Y., Parizi, R. M., & Korayem, M. (2020). Blockchain-based certification for education, employment, and skill with incentive mechanism. Blockchain cybersecurity, trust and privacy, 269-290.

Lutfiani, N., Aini, Q., Rahardja, U., Wijayanti, L., Nabila, E. A., & Ali, M. I. (2021). Transformation of blockchain and opportunities for education 4.0. International Journal of Education and Learning, 3(3), 222-231.

Ma, Y., & Fang, Y. (2020). Current status, issues, and challenges of blockchain applications in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(12), 20-31.

Ma, Y., & Fang, Y. (2020). Current status, issues, and challenges of blockchain applications in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(12), 20-31.

Marcoux, R. M., & Vogenberg, F. R. (2016). Telehealth: applications from a legal and regulatory perspective. Pharmacy and therapeutics, 41(9), 567.

Mohammad, A., & Vargas, S. (2022). Challenges of using blockchain in the education sector: A literature review. Applied Sciences, 12(13), 6380.

Mohammad, A., & Vargas, S. (2022, August). Barriers affecting higher education institutions’ adoption of blockchain technology: A qualitative study. In Informatics (Vol. 9, No. 3, p. 64). MDPI.

Monrat, A. A., Schelén, O., & Andersson, K. (2019). A survey of blockchain from the perspectives of applications, challenges, and opportunities. Ieee Access, 7, 117134-117151.

Mueen, A., Zafar, B., & Manzoor, U. (2016). Modeling and predicting students’ academic performance using data mining techniques. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 8(11), 36-42.

Mulyana, E., & Saepudin, A. (2006). Perkembangan Dan Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Jarak Jauh. Jurnal Teknodik, 119-134.

Parack, S., Zahid, Z., & Merchant, F. (2012, January). Application of data mining in educational databases for predicting academic trends and patterns. In 2012 IEEE international conference on technology enhanced education (ICTEE) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.

Qin, M., Su, C. W., Lobonţ, O. R., & Umar, M. (2023). Blockchain: a carbon-neutral facilitator or an environmental destroyer?. International Review of Economics & Finance, 86, 604-615.

Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Hughes, D. L. (2022). Analysis of challenges for blockchain adoption within the Indian public sector: An interpretive structural modelling approach. Information Technology & People, 35(2), 548-576.

Rezeki, S. G., & Nasution, M. I. P. (2023). Peranan Penggunaan Basis Data dalam Sistem Informasi Manajemen. IJM: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary, 1(4), 1243-1251.

Steiu, M. F. (2020). Blockchain in education: Opportunities, applications, and challenges. First Monday.

Steiu, M. F. (2020). Blockchain in education: Opportunities, applications, and challenges. First Monday.

Strage, A. (2004). LONG-TERM ACADEMIC BENEFITS OF SERVICE-LEARNING: WHEN ANDWHERE DO THEY MANIFEST THEMSELVES?. College student journal, 38(2).

SUTOPO, W. F. A. (2017). Keamanan Informasi Pada Dokumen Fisik dan Digital (Doctoral dissertation, Fakultas Teknik).

Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".

Widayanti, R., Rahardja, U., Oganda, F. P., Hardini, M., & Devana, V. T. (2021, October). Students formative assessment framework (faus) using the blockchain. In 2021 3rd International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent System (ICORIS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Wüst, K., & Gervais, A. (2018, June). Do you need a blockchain?. In 2018 crypto valley conference on blockchain technology (CVCBT) (pp. 45-54). IEEE.

Yusuf, F. (2021). The independent campus program for higher education in Indonesia: The role of government support and the readiness of institutions, lecturers, and students. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 12(2), 280-304.

Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H. N., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2018). Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey. International journal of web and grid services, 14(4), 352-375.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-02

Issue

Section

Articles