ETHICAL DILEMMAS AND MORAL FRAMEWORKS: NAVIGATING THE INTEGRATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ISLAMIC SOCIETIES
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Islamic Societies, Ethical Dilemmas, Moral Frameworks, Integration, Technology Ethics, Cultural Values.Abstract
In Islamic societies, integrating artificial intelligence (AI) poses significant ethical dilemmas, necessitating a careful navigation of moral frameworks. This abstract encapsulates the essence of a comprehensive exploration of these intricate dynamics. As AI technologies advance and permeate various aspects of society, the ethical considerations surrounding their adoption become increasingly paramount. In the specific context of Islamic societies, where cultural, religious, and ethical values play a central role in daily life, the integration of AI introduces a complex interplay between innovation and tradition. This study delves into the ethical dilemmas inherent to AI deployment in Islamic societies, examining data privacy, autonomy, accountability, and bias. To navigate these ethical quandaries, it is essential to consider the moral frameworks embedded in Islamic ethics and jurisprudence. The study explores how Islamic principles, including justice, compassion, and ethical responsibility, can guide the development and deployment of AI technologies. Furthermore, it investigates the compatibility and potential tensions between contemporary AI ethics and Islamic moral values. Through a multidisciplinary lens, encompassing fields such as computer science, ethics, theology, and law, this research offers a nuanced understanding of the ethical challenges posed by AI in Islamic societies. It aims to contribute to the ongoing discourse on responsible AI integration while preserving the moral fabric of Islamic traditions.
References
Aslan, Hifza, Syakhrani, A. W., Syafruddin, R., & Putri, H. (2020). CURRICULUM AS CULTURAL ACCULTURATION. Santhet: (Jurnal Sejarah, Pendidikan, Dan Humaniora), 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.36526/santhet.v4i1.860
Cocchia, A. (2014). Smart and digital city: A systematic literature review. Smart city: How to create public and economic value with high technology in urban space, 13-43.
Garside, R. (2014). Should we appraise the quality of qualitative research reports for systematic reviews, and if so, how?. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 27(1), 67-79.
Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2015). Lean and green–a systematic review of the state of the art literature. Journal of cleaner production, 102, 18-29.
Giroux, H. (2018). Pedagogy and the politics of hope: Theory, culture, and schooling: A critical reader. Routledge.
Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating the blueprint for your “house”. Administrative issues journal, 4(2), 4.
Grover, P., & Kar, A. K. (2017). Big data analytics: A review on theoretical contributions and tools used in literature. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 18, 203-229.
Haraldstad, K., Wahl, A., Andenæs, R., Andersen, J. R., Andersen, M. H., Beisland, E., ... & LIVSFORSK network. (2019). A systematic review of quality of life research in medicine and health sciences. Quality of life Research, 28, 2641-2650.
Hifza, Juliana, Palapa, A., Maskur, & Aslan. (2020). The Strategic Foundation for Competitive Excellent Development in Integrated Islamic Primary Schools in Indonesia. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(12s), Article 12s.
Horani, O. M., Khatibi, A., AL-Soud, A. R., Tham, J., & Al-Adwan, A. S. (2023). Determining the factors influencing business analytics adoption at organizational level: a systematic literature review. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(3), 125.
Hutagaluh, O., Aslan, Putra, P., Syakhrani, A. W., & Mulyono, S. (2020). SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP ON ISLAMIC EDUCATION. IJGIE : International Journal of Graduate of Islamic Education, 1(1), Article 1.
Kaufman, B. E. (2015). Evolution of strategic HRM as seen through two founding books: A 30th anniversary perspective on development of the field. Human Resource Management, 54(3), 389-407.
Kereopa-Yorke, B. (2023). Building Resilient SMEs: Harnessing Large Language Models for Cyber Security in Australia. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.02612.
Kot, M., Castleden, H., & Gagnon, G. A. (2015). The human dimension of water safety plans: a critical review of literature and information gaps. Environmental Reviews, 23(1), 24-29.
Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Ali, F. (2022). Advancing knowledge through literature reviews:‘what’,‘why’, and ‘how to contribute’. The Service Industries Journal, 42(7-8), 481-513.
Luo, T. C., Aguilera, A., Lyles, C. R., & Figueroa, C. A. (2021). Promoting physical activity through conversational agents: mixed methods systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(9), e25486.
Manullang, S. O., Mardani, M., & Aslan, A. (2021). The Effectiveness of Al-Quran Memorization Methods for Millennials Santri During Covid-19 in Indonesia. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(2), 195–207.
Martinez, D., Otegi, A., Soroa, A., & Agirre, E. (2014). Improving search over Electronic Health Records using UMLS-based query expansion through random walks. Journal of biomedical informatics, 51, 100-106.
McKinley, J. (2015). Critical argument and writer identity: Social constructivism as a theoretical framework for EFL academic writing. Critical inquiry in language studies, 12(3), 184-207.
Mohamed Shaffril, H. A., Samsuddin, S. F., & Abu Samah, A. (2021). The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners. Quality & Quantity, 55, 1319-1346.
Molden, B. (2016). Resistant pasts versus mnemonic hegemony: On the power relations of collective memory. Memory Studies, 9(2), 125-142.
Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2015). A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research.
Orsmond, G. I., & Cohn, E. S. (2015). The distinctive features of a feasibility study: objectives and guiding questions. OTJR: occupation, participation and health, 35(3), 169-177.
Peters, M. D., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., ... & Khalil, H. (2021). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI evidence implementation, 19(1), 3-10.
Riley, S. R., & Hunter, L. (2009). Mapping landscapes for performance as research: scholarly acts and creative cartographies. Springer.
Rowe, F. (2014). What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(3), 241-255.
Rudasill, K. M., Snyder, K. E., Levinson, H., & L Adelson, J. (2018). Systems view of school climate: A theoretical framework for research. Educational psychology review, 30, 35-60.
Skivington, K., Matthews, L., Simpson, S. A., Craig, P., Baird, J., Blazeby, J. M., ... & Moore, L. (2021). A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. bmj, 374.
Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., & Graham, I. D. (Eds.). (2013). Knowledge translation in health care: moving from evidence to practice. John Wiley & Sons.
Suroso, A., Hendriarto, P., Mr, G. N. K., Pattiasina, P. J., & Aslan, A. (2021). Challenges and opportunities towards an Islamic cultured generation: Socio-cultural analysis. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5n1.1203
Templier, M., & Paré, G. (2015). A framework for guiding and evaluating literature reviews. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(1), 6.
Touboulic, A., & Walker, H. (2015). Theories in sustainable supply chain management: a structured literature review. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 45(1/2), 16-42.
Townsend, C. V. (2019). Advancing African American women in public higher education: A phenomenological study of recruitment, retention, and career ascension (Doctoral dissertation, Northwest Nazarene University).
Valverde-Berrocoso, J., Garrido-Arroyo, M. D. C., Burgos-Videla, C., & Morales-Cevallos, M. B. (2020). Trends in educational research about e-learning: A systematic literature review (2009–2018). Sustainability, 12(12), 5153.
Widjaja, G., & Aslan, A. (2022). Blended Learning Method in The View of Learning and Teaching Strategy in Geography Study Programs in Higher Education. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v5i1.1852
Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European journal of education, 48(2), 311-325.
Zabak, S., Varma, A., Bansod, S., Pohane, M. R., & Varma Sr, A. (2023). Exploring the Complex Landscape of Delayed Childbearing: Factors, History, and Long-Term Implications. Cureus, 15(9).
Zainuddin, Z., Chu, S. K. W., Shujahat, M., & Perera, C. J. (2020). The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational research review, 30, 100326.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2023-10-23 (2)
- 2023-10-23 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Indah Rahayu, Handrini Ardiyanti, Loso Judijanto, A. Hamid, Eyad Saleh Bani-Domi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
