SCOPE OF EDUCATION MANAGEMENT: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORGANIZATION, ADMINISTRATION AND EDUCATION MANAGEMENT
Keywords:
Scope, relationship, organization, administration, education managementAbstract
This study aims to examine in depth the scope of educational management with a focus on the relationship between the organization, administration, and management of education. These three components are considered the main pillars in managing an effective and efficient education system. The research method used is a literature study. The results of the study indicate that the organization, administration, and management of education have a close relationship and influence each other in the process of managing education. The organization acts as a fundamental structure that provides a framework for the implementation of educational activities, while the administration is responsible for the arrangement and coordination of operational processes within the organization. Educational management focuses on strategic planning, decision making, and control to ensure the achievement of educational goals optimally. The organization, administration, and management of education are three main pillars that cannot be separated in achieving educational goals. Each pillar has a specific role and function that complements and supports each other. Without good synergy between the three, the education system will not be able to function optimally.
References
Abbas, J., Zhang, Q., Hussain, I., Akram, S., Afaq, A., & Shad, M. A. (2020). Sustainable innovation in small medium enterprises: the impact of knowledge management on organizational innovation through a mediation analysis by using SEM approach. Sustainability, 12(6), 2407.
Aisyah, S., Ilmi, M. U., Rosyid, M. A., Wulandari, E., & Akhmad, F. (2022). Kiai Leadership Concept in The Scope of Pesantren Organizational Culture. Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education, 3(1), 40-59.
Akram, M., & Khan, A. M. (2020). Exploring e-leadership of principals: Increasing school effectiveness by learning management system. Journal of Education & Social Sciences, 8(1), 15-30.
Alayoubi, M. M., Al Shobaki, M. J., & Abu-Naser, S. S. (2020). Strategic leadership practices and their relationship to improving the quality of educational service in Palestinian Universities. International Journal of Business Marketing and Management (IJBMM), 5(3), 11-26.
Atasoy, R. (2020). The Relationship Between School Principals' Leadership Styles, School Culture and Organizational Change. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(5), 256-274.
Díez, F., Villa, A., López, A. L., & Iraurgi, I. (2020). Impact of quality management systems in the performance of educational centers: educational policies and management processes. Heliyon, 6(4).
Figueiró, P. S., Neutzling, D. M., & Lessa, B. (2022). Education for sustainability in higher education institutions: A multi-perspective proposal with a focus on management education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 339, 130539.
Göker, S. D., & Göker, M. Ü. (2020). Rethinking innovative learning opportunities for teachers in educational organizations toward education 4.0. In Organizational Culture. IntechOpen.
Gümüş, S., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2020). The relationship between professional development and school principals’ leadership practices: the mediating role of self-efficacy. International journal of educational management, 34(7), 1155-1170.
Hallinger, P. (2020). Science mapping the knowledge base on educational leadership and management from the emerging regions of Asia, Africa and Latin America, 1965–2018. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(2), 209-230.
Hımmetoglu, B., Aydug, D., & Bayrak, C. (2020). Education 4.0: Defining the teacher, the student, and the school manager aspects of the revolution. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(Special Issue-IODL), 12-28.
Kalkan, Ü., Altınay Aksal, F., Altınay Gazi, Z., Atasoy, R., & Dağlı, G. (2020). The relationship between school administrators’ leadership styles, school culture, and organizational image. Sage Open, 10(1), 2158244020902081.
Komalasari, K., Arafat, Y., & Mulyadi, M. (2020). Principal’s management competencies in improving the quality of education. Journal of social work and Science Education, 1(2), 181-193.
Kovalenko, S. M., Romelashvili, O. S., Zborovska, T. V., & Blagun, O. D. (2020). General aspects of introduction of management systems in educational organizations in pursuance of ISO 21001: 2018. Management, economy and quality assurance in pharmacy, (4 (64)), 4-9.
Lam, L., Nguyen, P., Le, N., & Tran, K. (2021). The relation among organizational culture, knowledge management, and innovation capability: Its implication for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 66.
Lueg, K., & Graf, A. (2022). The organization of higher education: An overview of sociological research into universities as organizations. Research handbook on the sociology of organizations, 13-29.
Marsakha, A. T., Hariri, H., & Sowiyah, S. (2021). Management of character education in school: A literature review. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(2), 185-194.
Meyer, A., Richter, D., & Hartung-Beck, V. (2022). The relationship between principal leadership and teacher collaboration: Investigating the mediating effect of teachers’ collective efficacy. Educational management administration & leadership, 50(4), 593-612.
Moore, T. J., Johnston, A. C., & Glancy, A. W. (2020). STEM integration: A synthesis of conceptual frameworks and definitions. In Handbook of research on STEM education (pp. 3-16). Routledge.
Narymen, B. (2022). Theoretical foundations for the development of innovations in higher education organizations on the example of higher education organizations Russian Federation. Human Progress, 8(2), 1.
Norman-Major, K. (2023). Balancing the four Es; or can we achieve equity for social equity in public administration?. In Social Equity in the Public Administration Classroom (pp. 27-46). Routledge.
Pettersson, F. (2021). Understanding digitalization and educational change in school by means of activity theory and the levels of learning concept. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 187-204.
Pugacheva, N., Kirillova, T., Kirillova, O., Luchinina, A., Korolyuk, I., & Lunev, A. (2020). Digital paradigm in educational management: The case of construction education based on emerging technologies. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(13), 96-115.
Stephens, M. D. (Ed.). (2021). International organizations in education. Routledge.
Welsh, R. O., & Swain, W. A. (2020). (Re) defining urban education: A conceptual review and empirical exploration of the definition of urban education. Educational Researcher, 49(2), 90-100.
Zhang, X., Chen, Y., Hu, L., & Wang, Y. (2022). The metaverse in education: Definition, framework, features, potential applications, challenges, and future research topics. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1016300.
Zulaiha, D., Lian, B., & Mulyadi, M. (2020). The effect of principal’s competence and community participation on the quality of educational services. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 1(1), 45-57.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Gimin, Achmad Nashrul Waahib, Baskoro Ajie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
